|
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ANNOUNCES FAVORABLE SETTLEMENT OF COMPLAINT
ALLEGING DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON MILITARY DUTY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 7/11/00
CONTACT: JANE MCFARLAND
(202) 653-7984
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) today announced
the favorable settlement of a complaint filed by a member of the U.S. Naval
Reserve who alleged that the Internal Revenue Service violated the Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) when it
denied him employment because his reservist obligations precluded him from
attending job training.
The complainant, who asked that his name not be released,
alleged that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) withdrew a job offer as a
Tax Examining Assistant (TEA) when it discovered that his reservist
obligations prevented him from attending a five-week training session, which
newly hired TEA’s are required to complete at the start of their
employment.
According to the complainant, at the time he was hired,
his military duty (annual training) had already been scheduled and
conflicted with the agency’s mandatory training. The complainant’s
military service also conflicted with the IRS’s next scheduled TEA
training session.
Although the IRS attempted to accommodate the complainant
by offering him employment as a TEA with a training session scheduled at a
time that would not conflict with his reservist duties, the offer did not
include a remedy for the loss of employment benefits resulting from the
initial offer being withdrawn.
Under USERRA, a person who is a member of a uniformed
service may not be denied employment, or any benefit of employment, on the
basis of membership in or the performance of military service.
Pursuant to USERRA, the complainant initially filed his
complaint with the Department of Labor, Veterans Employment and Training
Service (VETS). After VETS notified the complainant, that it had concluded
that the statute had not been violated, he requested that the matter be
referred for litigation before the Merit Systems Protection Board (the
Board). Because the complaint had been filed against a federal executive
agency (rather than a State or private employer), the Secretary of Labor
transferred the matter to OSC for review and possible action before the
Board.
OSC reviewed the complaint and, rejecting the conclusion
VETS had reached, concluded that the IRS’s withdrawal of the initial
employment offer violated USERRA. With OSC’s intervention, the IRS and the
complainant reached a settlement that included the complainant’s
retroactive reinstatement to a TEA position and monetary damages.
Special Counsel Elaine Kaplan said, “As this case
demonstrates, OSC is committed to protecting the rights granted to veterans,
reservists, and others under USERRA.” Kaplan also noted that she was
“pleased with the manner in which the IRS responded to OSC’s view of the
case,” and complimented that agency “for diligently working with us to
reach a mutually agreeable settlement” with the complainant.
***
|