|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL (OSC)
- ●
- PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES
- ●
- WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION
|
|
3
|
- AUTHORIZED TO —
- INVESTIGATE PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
PROHIBITED BY CIVIL SERVICE LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION
- SEEK CORRECTIVE ACTION ON BEHALF OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE THE VICTIMS OF
PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES
- SEEK DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST AGENCY OFFICIALS WHO COMMIT PROHIBITED
PERSONNEL PRACTICES
|
|
4
|
- AUTHORIZED TO —
- PROVIDE A SAFE CHANNEL FOR WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES BY CURRENT AND
FORMER FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, AND APPLICANTS FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT
- ADVISE ON AND ENFORCE HATCH ACT PROVISIONS ON POLITICAL ACTIVITY
APPLICABLE TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
- PROTECT THE REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEE MILITARY VETERANS
AND RESERVISTS UNDER USERRA
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- AGENCY HEADS, AND OFFICIALS WITH DELEGATED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
AUTHORITY, ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR —
- PREVENTING PROHIBITED PERSONNEL
PRACTICES
- COMPLYING WITH AND ENFORCING
CIVIL SERVICE LAWS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS
- ENSURING THAT EMPLOYEES ARE INFORMED OF THEIR RIGHTS AND REMEDIES (IN
CONSULTATION WITH OSC)
|
|
7
|
- MERIT SYSTEM PRINCIPLES
- THE FRAMEWORK AND FOUNDATION FOR MAKING ALL PERSONNEL DECISIONS IN THE
CIVIL SERVICE
- PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES
- ADMONITIONS AGAINST SPECIFIC PRACTICES THAT CONFLICT WITH MERIT SYSTEMS
PRINCIPLES
- WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES
- OSC PROVIDES A SAFE CHANNEL FOR DISCLOSURES BY CURRENT AND FORMER
FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPLICANTS FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT
|
|
8
|
- 12 PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES — FALL UNDER ONE OF FOUR GENERAL
CATEGORIES:
- HIRING PRACTICES THAT OFFEND MERIT SYSTEM
- RETALIATION FOR ENGAGING IN PROTECTED ACTIVITY (INCLUDING
WHISTLEBLOWING)
- THE CATCH-ALL: VIOLATION OF LAWS, RULES OR REGULATIONS THAT IMPLEMENT
MERIT SYSTEMS PRINCIPLES (INCLUDING VIOLATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS)
|
|
9
|
- PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICE TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE:
- BASED ON RACE, COLOR, NATIONALITY, RELIGION, GENDER, HANDICAPPING
CONDITION, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, OR POLITICAL AFFILIATION
- BASED ON “CONDUCT WHICH DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE OF
THE EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT, OR THE PERFORMANCE OF OTHERS”
- 5 U.S.C. §§ 2302(b)(1) and (b)(10)
|
|
10
|
- PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICE TO:
- COERCE THE POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF ANY PERSON (INCLUDING PROVIDING OF ANY
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION OR SERVICE)
- TAKE ANY ACTION AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT FOR EMPLOYMENT AS A
REPRISAL FOR THE REFUSAL OF ANY PERSON TO ENGAGE IN SUCH POLITICAL
ACTIVITY
- 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(3)
|
|
11
|
- OBSTRUCTING THE RIGHT TO COMPETE
- INFLUENCING WITHDRAWAL FROM COMPETITION
- CONSIDERING IMPROPER JOB REFERENCES
- KNOWINGLY VIOLATING VETERANS’ PREFERENCE
- 5 U.S.C. §§ 2302(b)(2); (b)(4); (b)(5); (b)(6);(b)(7); (b)(11)
|
|
12
|
- MOST COMMON VIOLATIONS:
- DECEIVING OR WILFULLY OBSTRUCTING RIGHT TO COMPETE FOR EMPLOYMENT — 5
U.S.C. § 2302(b)(4)
- INFLUENCING WITHDRAWAL FROM COMPETITION IN ORDER TO IMPROVE OR INJURE
EMPLOYMENT PROSPECTS OF ANOTHER — 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(5)
- GIVING AN UNAUTHORIZED PREFERENCE OR ADVANTAGE TO IMPROVE OR INJURE
THE PROSPECTS OF ANY PARTICULAR
PERSON FOR EMPLOYMENT —
- 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(6)
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- CAVEATS:
- WHILE HIRING OFFENSES USUALLY REQUIRE INTENT TO DECEIVE OR MANIPULATE
THE SYSTEM, IF A LAW, RULE, OR REGULATION IMPLEMENTING A MERIT SYSTEM
PRINCIPLE IS VIOLATED IN THE PROCESS,
THAT WOULD ALSO BE A PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICE.
- NEGLIGENCE OR IMPRUDENT ACTIONS CAN CREATE THE APPEARANCE OF A HIRING
OFFENSE AND RESULT IN COMPLAINTS AND INVESTIGATIONS — E.G.,
BROADCASTING ONE’S CHOICE BEFORE COMPETITION IS HELD.
|
|
15
|
- MANAGER DELIBERATELY FAILS TO HAVE VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT POSTED, TO
PREVENT A PARTICULAR CANDIDATE FROM APPLYING FOR A VACANCY
- APPLICATION RECEIVED IS DELIBERATELY MISPLACED OR DESTROYED
- SUPERVISOR GIVES AN EMPLOYEE A DISHONEST RECOMMENDATION OR APPRAISAL TO
KEEP VALUABLE EMPLOYEE OR TO HELP ANOTHER CANDIDATE
|
|
16
|
- SUPERVISOR ENCOURAGES A SUBORDINATE NOT TO COMPETE, OR TO WITHDRAW HIS
OR HER APPLICATION, BY MAKING
PROMISES OF FUTURE BENEFITS THAT SUPERVISOR DOES NOT INTEND TO KEEP
- CLOSED VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT IS RE-OPENED TO PERMIT A FAVORED CANDIDATE
TO APPLY
|
|
17
|
- JOB QUALIFICATIONS ARE MANIPULATED TO FAVOR A PARTICULAR APPLICANT
- A SUPERVISOR ADVISES A QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE NOT TO APPLY FOR A JOB IN
ORDER TO IMPROVE ANOTHER EMPLOYEE’S CHANCES TO BE SELECTED
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- RECRUIT, SELECT, AND ADVANCE ON THE BASIS OF MERIT AFTER FAIR AND OPEN
COMPETITION
- TREAT EMPLOYEES AND APPLICANTS FAIRLY AND EQUITABLY
- PROVIDE EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK AND REWARD EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE
- MAINTAIN HIGH STANDARDS OF INTEGRITY, CONDUCT, AND CONCERN FOR THE
PUBLIC INTEREST
|
|
20
|
- MANAGE EMPLOYEES EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY
- RETAIN OR SEPARATE EMPLOYEES ON THE BASIS OF THEIR PERFORMANCE
- PROVIDE EMPLOYEES WITH EFFECTIVE TRAINING AND EDUCATION
- PROTECT EMPLOYEES FROM IMPROPER POLITICAL INFLUENCE
- PROTECT EMPLOYEES FROM REPRISAL FOR LAWFUL DISCLOSURES
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- CATEGORIES OF DISCLOSURES
- A VIOLATION OF ANY LAW, RULE OR REGULATION
- GROSS MISMANAGEMENT
- MORE THAN DE MINIMIS
- GROSS WASTE OF FUNDS
- MORE THAN A DEBATABLE EXPENDITURE
- ABUSE OF AUTHORITY
- SUBSTANTIAL AND SPECIFIC DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND/OR SAFETY
|
|
24
|
- GENERALLY PROTECTED WHEN MADE TO ANY PERSON (EXCEPT THE WRONGDOER)
- NEED NOT BE ACCURATE TO BE PROTECTED
- PROTECTED IF EMPLOYEE HAS A REASONABLE BELIEF THAT IT IS TRUE — TEST
IS BOTH OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE
|
|
25
|
- NO REQUIREMENT THAT EMPLOYEE GO THROUGH CHAIN OF COMMAND
- WHISTLEBLOWER’S PERSONAL MOTIVATION DOES NOT AFFECT REASONABLENESS OF
A DISCLOSURE
- EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT IS PROTECTED IF EMPLOYER MISTAKENLY BELIEVES HE
OR SHE IS A WHISTLEBLOWER
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- ANY FACTOR WHICH ALONE OR IN CONNECTION WITH OTHERS TENDS TO AFFECT IN
ANY WAY THE OUTCOME OF THE PERSONNEL ACTION AT ISSUE
- CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE / TIMING ALONE
- OFTEN ESTABLISHED BY CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
|
|
28
|
- AGENCY DEFENDS PERSONNEL ACTION BY SHOWING — BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING
EVIDENCE — THAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN THE SAME ACTION WITHOUT THE
DISCLOSURE.
- FACTORS:
- STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THE PERSONNEL ACTION
- EXISTENCE AND STRENGTH OF MOTIVE TO RETALIATE
- TREATMENT OF SIMILAR EMPLOYEES
WHO ARE NOT WHISTLEBLOWERS
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- IF THE AGENCY DOES NOT TAKE THE
- CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTED WITHIN
- A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME, OSC MAY
- FILE A PETITION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
- WITH THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- BE MEASURED IN YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS
- KEEP THE MERIT SYSTEMS CONCEPTS ON YOUR RADAR SCREEN
- SEEK EXPERT ADVICE WHEN YOU ARE UNSURE
- DEAL WITH PROBLEMS AS THEY OCCUR TO AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF BAD MOTIVE
- BE CONSISTENT IN YOUR MANAGEMENT OF YOUR EMPLOYEES
- DO YOUR BEST NOT TO BE SOMEONE ABOUT WHOM THE WHISTLE IS BLOWN
|
|
37
|
- THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL PROVIDES A SAFE CHANNEL FOR
WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, FORMER FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, AND APPLICANTS FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT
|
|
38
|
- JURISDICTIONAL ELEMENTS
- COVERED AGENCY
- MOST EXECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES
- COVERED POSITION
- A DISCLOSURE MUST BE RELATED TO AN EVENT THAT OCCURRED IN CONNECTION
WITH THE PERORMANCE OF AN EMPLOYEE’S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
|
|
39
|
- OSC DOES NOT HAVE INVESTIGATIVE AUTHORITY
- BY STATUTE, OSC SHALL MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD DETERMINATION
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER RECEIVING INFORMATION FROM A WHISTLEBLOWER
- SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD IS DEFINED AS THE DETERMINATION THAT THE AGENCY
IS MORE LIKELY THAN NOT TO FIND THE ALLEGATION SUBSTANTIATED AT THE
CONCLUSION OF ITS INVESTIGATION
- IN MAKING THE SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD DETERMINATION, OSC FOLLOWS THE
MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD DEFINITIONS OF A GROSS WASTE OF FUNDS,
GROSS MISMANAGMENT, AND AN ABUSE OF AUTHORITY
|
|
40
|
- REFERRALS--
- IF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL MAKES A POSITIVE DETERMINATION THAT THERE IS A
SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD THAT THE INFORMATION DISCLOSES ONE OR MORE OF
THE NOTED CATEGORIES OF WRONGDOING, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL MUST TRANSMIT
THE INFORMATION TO THE AGENCY HEAD
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- THE AGENCY’S REPORT AND ANY COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE WHISTLEBLOWER ARE
TRANSMITTED TO THE PRESIDENT AND THE CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEES
WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE AGENCY THAT THE DISCLOSURE INVOLVES
- 5 U.S.C. § 1213 (e)(3)
|
|
44
|
- IF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL DOES NOT MAKE A POSITIVE DETERMINATION THAT THERE
IS A SUBSTANTIAL LIKELIHOOD THAT THE INFORMATION DISCLOSES ONE OR MORE
OF THE CATEGORIES OF WRONGDOING, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL INFORMS THE
WHISTLEBLOWER
- THE REASONS WHY THE DISLSOURE MAY NOT BE FURTHER ACTED ON, AND
- DIRECTS THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO OTHER OFFICES AVAILABLE FOR RECEIVING
DISCLSOSURES—5 U.S.C. § 1213 (g)(3)
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|